home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
102990
/
1029107.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-02-26
|
4KB
|
85 lines
<text id=90TT2829>
<link 90TT3156>
<title>
Oct. 29, 1990: With Friends Like These
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
Oct. 29, 1990 Can America Still Compete?
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
NATION, Page 43
With Friends Like These
</hdr>
<body>
<p>New evidence reveals what three Senators did in exchange for
Keating's hefty campaign gifts
</p>
<p> Among Washington's chummy power brokers, it is not unusual
for a Senator to ask a federal regulator about an investigation
involving his constituents. But can the timing of such an
inquiry mean that improper influence was exerted? How about
calls made to an official's unlisted home telephone number late
at night or at 5:30 in the morning?
</p>
<p> The Senate ethics committee was faced with such fine
questions last week in its plodding probe of five Senators who
may have gone too far in their attempt to get federal officials
off the back of Charles Keating, a generous contributor to
their campaigns. Keating, 66, was released on $300,000 bail
last week after spending a month in a California jail awaiting
trial on charges that he misled investors in his bankrupt
Lincoln Savings & Loan, whose failure will cost taxpayers $2
billion. Ten months into its investigation, the committee is
still trying to decide whether at least three Democratic
Senators--Michigan's Donald Riegle, California's Alan
Cranston and Arizona's Dennis DeConcini--should be punished
by the Senate. A battle of leaked documents was launched last
week by insiders hoping to influence the decision.
</p>
<p> According to one such document, Roger F. Martin, a former
member of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, which regulates
S&Ls, told Senate investigators that Cranston called him at
home late one night last spring and that DeConcini reached him
the same way at 5:30 the next morning. Both had urged that
Lincoln Savings be sold to an interested buyer rather than be
shut down. Martin told the probers, "I have never, either
before or since this incident, received a telephone call at
home from any Senator or Representative regarding a board
matter."
</p>
<p> The leaks also seemed designed to ensnare Riegle. One
document suggests that he benefited from two 1987 fund raisers
arranged partly by Keating. Shortly afterward, the disclosures
indicate, Riegle set up a meeting of the five Senators with
regulators to press Keating's cause. The other two Senators
present, Ohio Democrat John Glenn and Arizona Republican John
McCain, reportedly have been cleared of wrongdoing.
</p>
<p> House Republicans were leak targets too. A 1986 letter from
16 of them, including Dick Cheney and Newt Gingrich, asked Bank
Board ex-chairman Edwin Gray for "internal memoranda" about the
board's decisions on certain S&L matters that could have helped
Keating. Gray refused the request and charged last week that
the Congressmen had been "duped and used" by the indicted
financier.
</p>
<p> All five Senators deplored the leaks, claiming that they
were taken out of context and that they distorted their
relations with Keating. The war of disclosures clearly had
partisan aims. Republicans hoped to raise the heat on the three
Democrats still under investigation and force full Senate
action before the Nov. 6 elections. Democrats wanted to keep
Republican McCain under suspicion and postpone any pre-election
condemnation of their coziness with the indicted financier.
</p>
<p>By Ed Magnuson. Reported by Hays Gorey/Washington.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>